People with canonical visions are rare.
What is a canonical vision :
Some canonical visions are focused on a certain type of population (jews / Christians / yoga people), and some are about how a technology needs to affect the world ( situational awareness )
Canonical visions help direct billions of trillions of $ by giving capital more certainty about the future.
The people who have these canonical visions can express them through different mediums such as media, activism, lawsuits/music/funds/companies, and nonprofits.
The companies don't have to be tech companies;
The medium is less important than the vision :
There is a big confusion in our society: we are organizing and funding stuff based on their medium instead of funding the broad visions. People who work on a public good will not necessarily make change; people who write will not necessarily influence change.
A capital structure that doesn't exist yet:
Every capital vehicle is also medium-locked: VC funds can only do equity, foundations can only do grants, PACs can only do politics. If Herzl showed up today, no single vehicle could fund him — he needed a pamphlet, then a congress, then diplomacy, then a bank.
Optimistic vs pessimistic visions: optimistic visions that give people an instruction manual for how the future could look are much more effective then a passimistic ones. Even when there is a fear that initiates it (the Apollo program, the Manhattan Project, AI, and even space )
I want to fund people with canonical visions that are using different mediums and could be in politics/tech / social issues and ways of life.